Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - eberline

Pages: [1]
1
Bugs and Issues / autosize keyboard shortcut (Alt-Z)
« on: December 04, 2019, 11:34:46 am »
Docs say that multiple elements must be selected in order for autosize to be available via context menu, but seem to suggest that it should be available via the ribbon and the Alt-Z shortcut even with only a single element selected.

https://sparxsystems.com/enterprise_architect_user_guide/15.0/modeling/resizeelements.html
https://sparxsystems.com/enterprise_architect_user_guide/15.0/modeling/autosizeelements.html

The ribbon access is always there (Layout > Diagram > Select > Autosize Selected Elements).
But Alt-Z only works if multiple elements are selected.

Is this a defect in documentation, or in implementation?
Is there a reason why it should matter how many elements are selected?

2
Uml Process / object prototypes
« on: September 20, 2019, 04:51:59 am »
Given instances of the same type, in which one is a prototype that only provides default attribute values for the others which then may override some of those defaults, how should that sort of relationship between instances be modeled?

(The context is large-scale game development, in which level designers and other non-programmers use the prototyping architecture to specialize game objects without creating subclasses and recompiling.)

Thanks for any tips. A custom stereotype on a dependency is the best I could come up with.

Cheers,

3
General Board / incremental code import into a very large model
« on: July 12, 2019, 10:08:12 am »
Is it possible to perform an incremental code import, to both synchronize existing elements and import new ones? For our large project, a full re-import from source takes far too long to be practical for a nightly job. That's on a local .eapx repo; on a SQL Server repo over WAN, it would take days. (Even just doing a project transfer over WAN takes days; I'll be looking at PCS4 for WAN optimization, later.)

I tried temporarily removing from the source tree those files that haven't changed, but EA then considers those unchanged elements to be "not found in code". I was hoping it would instead ignore those elements, and only consider removing elements no longer found in their still-found source files.

I need an automatable workflow to control missing code elements separately from missing code files. Or some other way to accomplish incremental import, for example if EA would compare model element timestamps with source file timestamps.

Any suggestions?

4
What's the best way to model, and explore within EA, a hierarchy of Solution Explorer filter folders from Visual Studio?

I need to model legacy code currently arranged in solution explorer folders, filesystem folders, and C++ namespaces. The three hierarchies are not orthogonal, but not isomorphic either. Anybody have a preferred modeling pattern/practice for this?

What I've been doing is manually creating a package structure that aspires to somehow unify the C++ namespaces and solution explorer folders. C++ namespaces have packages, and if pretty much isomorphic to a solution explorer folder, I use the latter as a package alias. For a solution explorer folder not isomorphic to a C++ namespace, I make it its own package but set "Suppress Namespace". Then I import whatever C++ headers are assign to a solution explorer folder within whatever model package represents that folder (either as itself or as a C++ namespace alias). In this manner I get a model that is somewhat useful as a starting point, but only that. I generally have to manually fix various relationships, because the solution explorer folders are just this fiction not actually represented in the C++ source code that was imported.

For policy and/or institutional cultural reasons, C++ namespaces are pretty coarse-grained and historically not really encouraged. Likewise with source filesystem folders. Whether I had EA's importer assign a package per C++ namespace or per filesystem folder, either way if I just ignored the solution explorer folders entirely, the model package hierarchy would be overly flat, with enormous packages serving as dumping grounds for hundreds of elements.

For better or worse, the VS folder hierarchy does embody much of the design. Round-tripping isn't needed at this time, but being able to re-sync the model to updated source code would be great.

Any suggestions? Thanks for reading.

5
Suggestions and Requests / hide specific return types
« on: May 14, 2016, 07:37:35 am »
Diagram properties -> Features -> Feature Options -> Show Operation Return Type

This really wants a subordinate property to hide specific operation return types. For example, the types 'void' for Java/C#/C++ and 'nil' for Lua. As return types, they're usually just diagram noise.

6
Suggestions and Requests / import utility functions in C++ namespaces
« on: March 25, 2016, 05:57:44 am »
I wish EA had a C++ import option to treat namespaces declaring non-class functions as <<utility>> classes with static methods. Rather than not importing them at all. These are often functions that I'd like to include on sequence diagrams and drill down to model their behavior.

Or maybe leave the namespace a namespace, and instead create a class named "<anonymous>" to hold static method declarations, as is already done for anonymous enumerations.

7
Suggestions and Requests / status update please re. MDG Integration for VS
« on: September 17, 2009, 04:24:56 am »
Don't you think maybe it's about time for some official announcement re. MDG Integration for Visual Studio? Almost eight months is an extraordinarily long time between beta and either a subsequent beta or an official release. Particularly for Sparx, which has such a history of frequent updates.

What are Sparx's intentions for this product? Is it considered to be at its end of life and no longer under active development?

Ref.  MDG Integration for Visual Studio v4.0, Beta 1, Jan 29th, 2009; and also I'm not the only one asking.

Best regards,

8
When using Add Branch to Version Control on a nested package hierarchy, EA submits each package in a separate Perforce changelist. One. At. A. Time. Trying to workaround by saving to a numbered changelist (that is, a non-default changelist) fails to add the package to Perforce. Submitting all the package XMI files as a single changelist would be much more convenient, particularly when writing a single changelist description to be used for all of the packages.

Cheers,
Scott


9
Suggestions and Requests / single EA icon in alt-tab task switcher
« on: January 09, 2007, 05:41:13 pm »
(EA 6.5 build 802)

Currently the alt-tab task switcher on Windows shows a separate icon for every floating EA window. It would be much more convenient if EA would show up as a single icon in the task switcher, so I don't have to alt-tab-tab-tab-tab-tab-tab to switch to the next most recent app.

Regards,

10
Suggestions and Requests / EABase_JET4.eap
« on: January 23, 2006, 01:10:53 pm »
From another thread in the General forum,

Quote
Re: new project in ea 6.1
 
You can no longer select which file will be the used as the base model for new projects - it is now always EABase.eap (found in the EA dir).  You can replace this file with your preferred base model.  
 
Ash
The Sparx Team
support@sparxsystems.com.au


It would be helpful if EABase_JET4.eap were included in the EA full installation package, and selecting

   Tools -> Options -> General -> Use JET 4.0

would cause new models to start from EABase_JET4.eap instead of EABase.eap.

Regards,

11
Suggestions and Requests / UI inconsistency re. multiple stereotypes
« on: November 02, 2006, 06:19:39 pm »
The EA 6.5.799 UI allows specification of multiple stereotypes for class attributes via the "..." button next to the stereotype drop-down list, but no such button is displayed for «table» columns.

Likewise for class operations vs. «table» constraint operations.

12
General Board / error safety guarantees
« on: April 26, 2006, 08:05:09 pm »
Can anyone recommend the best way to model that an operation offers a basic vs. strong vs. no-fail safety guarantee? A tagged value seems the most straightforward, but I don't know how to get EA to display operation tagged values in class diagrams.

13
Uml Process / implicit primary key?
« on: November 02, 2006, 05:38:15 pm »
Any thoughts on the best way to model a database table in which the primary key is implicit, for example a table record POID? Specifically, in an EDB volume on Windows Mobile, I want to use the CEOID value returned by CeWriteRecordProps and CeReadRecordPropsEx as the primary key. Sort of like a derived attribute, that is, not an explicit table column, but I don't see how to model such in a classifier stereotyped «table».

And of course I want to be able to use it in a foreign key constraint elsewhere.

Any ideas?

Pages: [1]