Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - qwerty

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 709
31
Either the XMI way (which does not include resources like images etc.) or simply transfer (Configure/Transfer/Model) the whole model and delete the unneeded roots afterwards (plus compress .eap).

q.

32
General Board / Re: What about EA running in iOS Catalina version?
« on: November 20, 2019, 09:23:03 am »
I will comment on Parallels at about 6. December....

q.

33
Uml Process / Re: Composition, Aggregation, EAUML and SPEM
« on: November 20, 2019, 08:16:51 am »
Probably because that connector has gone in later UML versions and been replaced by associations with properties on one end.

SPEM? I see all those profiles as SPAM.

q.

34
General Board / Re: how to get rid of locks
« on: November 20, 2019, 08:14:34 am »
The diagrams can be un-/locked without security...

q.

35
General Board / Re: how to get rid of locks
« on: November 19, 2019, 05:54:20 am »
Right click the diagram at a free place: Lock/Unlock in the lower third.

q.

P.S. you might reset t_diagram.locked via repository.execute.

36
General Board / Re: What about EA running in iOS Catalina version?
« on: November 18, 2019, 10:27:01 am »
Parallels claims to be Catalina compliant and will run Windoze. Means you can use EA further on. I can't confirm yet, since my new MPB is only ordered yet and the old one is stuck on High Sierra.

q.

37
Bugs and Issues / Re: Status Dropdown display order ???
« on: November 18, 2019, 03:08:39 am »
You're expecting too much. Bug fixing at Sparx is something not visible due to the sand storms around their premises. Or something along those lines. Try searching this forum for "bug tracker" and you might find complaints about it reaching back to 2005 (stretching in the old forum) or so. Just submit a bug report (see bottom of this page) for this and see what the reaction will be. Again: don't expect too much :-/

q.

38
I only used the doc generator in the beginning (V3 or 4) and it was honestly just crap. I heard it got better. Obviously, since the number of complaints isn't that high. Now, why am I still not using it? There are two reasons: first I can compile any complex requirement for a document as I'm using my preferred language (which is simply Python but any other would do as well). The second even more important reason: it produces PDF and no choice to have Word at all. Now, why is it that important? Because any 馬鹿 wants Word to just starting to correct things in that export. A r/w export is just a fail in itself. PDF still allows to comment, but it's not that easy as in a Word document. That's why people get used to make the changes where they ought to be: in the model. Not having Word means: stepping towards the single source of truth. Using Word means open the gates to hell. Where is the truth? In which version of which copy on whose desk?

q.

39
Bugs and Issues / Re: Status Dropdown display order ???
« on: November 17, 2019, 05:45:37 am »
Use a tagged value with an enum instead.

q.

40
You know what? I don't use that document generator. I wrote my own generator that creates LaTeX. And a secret: If I find a bug, I can fix it. TeX itself is almost bug free (go try to find one and earn a couple of thousand dollars from Donald Knuth) and LaTeX/the packages you need are also well tested by many many scientists. So if somethings runs wrong I use the debugger and some of my time to make it right. Mean, I know...

q.

41
General Board / Re: Shape Scripts - addSubshape
« on: November 13, 2019, 11:26:52 pm »
As said: Fail with EA. Fail better with EA.

Don't start trying to make sense of such things. When it works for you just put it in a box and forget about it. Frustrating? Yes, but you get used to it after some time.

For me it was helpful to create that left bar of a requirement element. I had already given up, but this way it works.

q.

42
General Board / Re: Shape Scripts - addSubshape
« on: November 13, 2019, 11:20:56 am »
That's quite useful. I wasn't aware of that effect.

q.

43
General Board / Re: Shape Scripts - addSubshape
« on: November 13, 2019, 09:08:37 am »
Yeah. The sarcastic undertone in my reply might e a bit unrecognizable (though reading my other posts it should be obvious). The only thing that helps is to try and fail with EA. Currently I'm feeling like Don Quixote fighting against shape scripts in decorations. That gives me the creeps...

q.

44
General Board / Re: Shape Scripts - addSubshape
« on: November 13, 2019, 04:44:05 am »
It's documented in the help (quite unusual, isn't it?) and specifies width and height (in units) of the compartment. How that effects the rendered shape is a different question. It depends on the layoutType specification.

q.

45
Just to go back one step: have you used Synch Stereotypes before trying some futile coding (the MDG tagged values/stereotype properties are not directly present and created by EA on demand).

q.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 709