Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - PeterHeintz

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 58
1
At a first place I found information that Microsoft will not update those drivers to TLS 1.2. But now I saw that Microsoft changed there mind and newer OLE MSSQL version supporting TLS1.2 are available. So this is solved!

2
Our IT updated our firewall to TLS version 1.2. I am using 'Microsoft OLE DB Driver for SQL Server' which is depreciated by Microsoft since 2005 and supporting TLS V1.0 only. What MSSQL diver supporting TLS 1.2 can I use instead?
I tried the MSSQL native driver V11 but I did not get it to work.

3
Bugs and Issues / Re: V15 Document Generation PDF: content is scaled down
« on: September 10, 2020, 07:01:41 pm »
Thelonius,
what you gave up, I did for years and it worked well. I had up to now no time to do some investigations, but I have the feeling it has somewhat to do with screen resolutions.

4
In the current released build 1554, call behavior actions pin still do not show the classifiers of the related parameters.

5
This problem still exists in build 1553.
It seems to be somehow related to the monitor resolution!?

6
Hi Francisco,
I just do not use cloud connection when I do baselining.

7
General Board / Re: Notes in requirements diagram
« on: July 21, 2020, 10:25:59 pm »
Among other things you can control the visibility of notes on diagram or elements level.
To control the visibility on diagram levels, go to the diagram properties select “Elements” and check or uncheck under “Show Compartments”  “Notes”.
To control the visibility on element levels, select the element in the diagram press “Shift” & “Strg” & “y” to open the “Compartment Visibility” dialog and check or uncheck “Notes”.

8
This import will work and in this case you should not change the GUIDs by the import.
The import will do somehow the following.
It deletes you empty package A and afterwards it imports the filled package A.

9
Bugs and Issues / Locked Views cannot move up in order
« on: July 16, 2020, 05:33:23 pm »
If you have locked packages under an unlocked package those packages can be moved up and down in order, what is what I expect.
If you have locked views (name locked) under the Root Node, another user can move unlocked views down under a locked view but not locked views up over an unlocked view.
Seen in Build 1552

10
Uml Process / Re: properties
« on: July 04, 2020, 12:42:42 am »
Hi,
if you expect to see the property as list in the frame of you IBD, this will not work. The compartment visibility relates the blocks shown on a BDD.
The same is valid for the initial value. This you will see in the BDD only.

11
Yes! I am in contact with Sparx support.

12
I try to use Jira integration, but I am facing some problems.
I have setup the pro cloud somehow, so I see in EA in Type Mapping as Provider JIRA, but I get a “A security error occurred” message.
In EA I use windows authentication and in Jira I use single sign on of my ADS account. Within the ProCloud Server no user and password are set.
My expectation is that my windows account and password (which is my ADS account) is forwarded to Jira as well. However, I get the message above.
So I created a native Jira account and somehow (I do not know how) I saw once a login box in EA were I inserted my native Jira account. However, this did not work, and now I do not see the login box any more.
Any ideas?

13
When I try to add action pins based on activity parameters (Interaction Points), I get a primary key violation due to duplicate keys message box. The pins are created afterwards, but the classifiers are missed.
Remark: While fixing this, it might also be a good idea to take over properties like “Stream” from parameters to pins.
With our productive build 1428 this works.

14
Hi Eve,
thank you very much for this very helpful information. Disabling the checkbox as you mentioned in 2. makes me happy.
After looking in my model in some places were I did such kind of things, I realized that in most case luckily, I have the activities in different packages. Not knowing that the package matters I came obviously to the conclusion that you change things frequently.
Although I do not understand, what sense it makes to move e.g. block property under an activity, once you ‘wiggle’ it on the activity diagram, I am with option 2. a happy user again! (at least in this case  ;))

15
Hi Eve,
I do this kind of cross referencing and displaying for years with EA.
When you create a new action on a diagram it gets the as parent the activity of the belonging diagram. This is, from my perspective, what it should be and what it was only until V13.
Somewhere in V14 the actions started to move when dropped to another activity diagram but as I remember only when dragged and dropped from a diagram and not from the project browser or vice versa. In some later versions this was gone and I was happy (at least for SysML).
In V15.2 drag and drop does not change the parent anyway, but the parent is changed when the position of the item changes on the diagram. In this way, when you have an action on two activity diagrams and you change the position on either diagram the element can jump around what is really strange.
If we assume that the specs require an action to have one parent and exist on one activity diagram only, it should not be allowed to show an action on different activity diagrams at all, instead of this element movement jumping.
This movement-based jumping gets even more confusing if parent the action belongs to is locked, because than it does not jump.

I admit that neither SysML nor UML specs are very clear in those aspects, but by removing the example in the UML text I read the UML spec as follows:
NOTE. This taxonomy provides a logical organization for the various major kinds of diagrams. However, it does not preclude mixing different kinds of diagram types. Consequently, the boundaries between the various kinds of diagram types are not strictly enforced.

Apart of the strange position movement based jump implementation, the problem is that you go from less strict=not strict to more strict=not strict and this causes problems for models created in the “less strict” mode.

With "The UML metamodel only allows an action to be contained within a single Activity. There are no exceptions." I totally agree, but were on earth are diagrams in the UML metamodel at all?

PS Switching of the frames does not help because than I lose my activity parameters.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 58